Flexible grid hookups for data centers face customer and control-room limits
FERC is pushing curtailable large-load tariffs. APS and SPP say hyperscalers resist being interruptible, and operator software can't yet manage curtailment.
Why it matters · Curtailable interconnection is a leading proposal for fitting data center load onto existing grids. Utility and RTO staff who run it describe slow uptake and a missing operational layer that tariffs on their own won't fix.
A year ago, Energy Secretary Chris Wright directed FERC to standardize large-load interconnection, including faster access for loads that agree to be curtailed. In June, FERC ordered all six RTOs to revise or justify their large-load tariffs. At GridFwd 2026, Latitude Media's Maeve Allsup asked a utility and an RTO how flexible interconnection is working so far.
How the risk moves
Chris Lynn, head of data centers at Arizona Public Service (just under 1.5 million customers around Phoenix), says a flexible agreement is a reallocation of risk. Under a firm agreement, the utility may have to buy expensive spot-market capacity at peak and pass the cost on to ordinary ratepayers. Under a flexible one, the large load takes that risk by accepting curtailment or running its own backup power during peak windows. Bills are rising anyway because of inflation and equipment costs, Lynn says, but this shift could make them rise more slowly.
APS has signed about 400 MW of flexible agreements. It treats them as a reliability backstop until new generation and transmission are built, not as the main way to speed up grid access. Lynn says customer demand is weaker than developers suggest. Developers promise their data center tenant will accept some curtailment, and then a "Big Five" customer tries to negotiate that term out at the end. "Being treated like a second class citizen just doesn't sell very well," he said, and highly interruptible service looks like "a long-term key accounts nightmare."
Southwest Power Pool sees more uptake. Its FERC-approved pathway offers conditional service for up to seven years while the transmission needed for firm service is built. SPP has received through its new framework. Some applicants are using the conditional option, but SPP hasn't said how many. Because customers asked for it, SPP is also developing an indefinite non-firm, price-responsive option, under which loads would curtail at set price thresholds. FERC has not approved it yet.







